Group+5+Script+Critique+(of+Group+3)

You are asked to listen to the reading of a group's mythbuster's episode and answer the following questions. Your responses will help the group improve their project. Please include positive comments as well as ways that students might improve.. = = =1. Is the flow smooth?= The flow was decent. They had not yet split up the lines amongst them so they didn't know who was saying what yet, so there were some pauses, but it was understandable.

=2. Do the students speak slowly. Are they easy to understand?= Yes. They were very articulate and they were easy to listen to.

=3. When listening to the introduction, do you have a clear understanding of the topic of the Mythbuster's episode?= Yes. Right away they talk about cars and their conversation revolves around cars and ramps so we were immediately clued in about what this episode would involve. =4. Do the students clearly describe the myth and the experiement used to test the myth?= Yes. They clearly state the myth they are trying to test and the mechanics behind their experiment.

=5. Is the correct scientific language used?= Yes, they used the appropriate terminology (e.g. friction, inclined plane, velocity) to describe their experiment.

=6. Any further comments/suggestions. (e.g. what is your overall impression, etc.)= We think your conclusion has been misnamed, it seems more like an introduction to your experiment as opposed to a final conclusion of the episode. Wouldn't your conclusion actually be something like "WOW THAT WAS G REAT! MYTH BUSTED/CONFIRMED/PLAUSIBLE"?

Overall it was a very concise explanation of the myth and the experiment.